Preparation
Contact lenses out at least three days before. Anaesthetic eye drops, then an eyelid speculum is put in place. There is no need to fast.
Home / Refractive surgery / SMILE
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction, without a flap
SMILE does not cut a flap. The femtosecond laser shapes a lenticule within the thickness of the cornea, which is then removed through an incision a few millimetres long. The structure of the cornea is better preserved and fewer surface nerves are cut, so dry eye after the operation is often less marked.
The procedure
As a day case, under anaesthetic eye drops, on the laser platform at the Institut Voltaire (Paris 11th). Consultation, assessment and follow-up take place at the practice in Rueil-Malmaison.
Contact lenses out at least three days before. Anaesthetic eye drops, then an eyelid speculum is put in place. There is no need to fast.
The VisuMax 800 shapes the lenticule in contact with the eye, in fourteen seconds. A peripheral micro-incision is made at the same time.
The lenticule is grasped and removed through the incision. It is painless. No second laser is needed: everything is done on the same machine.
The incision closes by itself. The treatment starts three to four hours later. The refraction settles over one to three months.
The five stages of SMILE: front view, then a vertical cross-section of the cornea
Anaesthetic eye drops, then an eyelid speculum is put in place. No injection and no general anaesthesia.
A cone comes into contact with the cornea and holds it still with gentle suction while the cut is made.
Within the thickness of the cornea, the femtosecond laser outlines a lens of tissue and a peripheral micro-incision. No flap is cut.
A fine spatula, inserted through the micro-incision, separates the lenticule from the surrounding tissue, first above it, then below.
The lenticule is grasped and removed in one piece through the micro-incision, which closes on its own, without stitches.
Treated area Lenticule removed Stroma Laser beam Instrument
Strengths and limits
No technique is better than the others in absolute terms. Each has situations where it is the best answer, and a downside you need to know about before choosing.
| Strengths | Limits |
|---|---|
| Greater safety: no flap, so no complications from cutting, handling or displacing one. | Recovery a little slower than LASIK in the first week: functional vision within 24 to 72 hours, with contrast and quality of vision still lagging behind at seven days. The gap usually closes within a month. |
| Corneal biomechanics better preserved than with LASIK, since the front layers stay intact. | Shorter clinical track record for hyperopia: only since 2024, against twenty-five years for LASIK. Early results are comparable, but long-term data are still lacking. |
| Less dry eye: fewer of the surface corneal nerves are cut. | Enhancement is trickier: there is no flap to lift again. It requires surface PRK or the CIRCLE technique. |
| A single laser: no change of machine during the operation. | Cost: the equipment used is more expensive. |
| Hyperopia treatable since 2024: the CE-marked SMILE pro module corrects up to seven dioptres. It is only available on the VisuMax 800, and the laser platform where I operate has one. | Limited availability: the hyperopia module only exists on the VisuMax 800. Few laser platforms in the Paris region (Île-de-France) have one; the one where I operate does. |
Side effects and complications
The expected side effects come from the technique itself: they are common and temporary. Complications are rare. They are listed here because you have the right to know about them before you give your consent.
Who it suits
These criteria point the way; they do not decide. Only the pre-operative assessment measures the actual geometry of your eyes.
Enhancement
SMILE leaves no flap to lift. There are two options: surface PRK, or the CIRCLE technique. CIRCLE uses the femtosecond laser to cut a circular incision and a hinge around the original cap, turning it into a LASIK flap. The flap is lifted, the excimer laser corrects what remains, and the flap is laid back. Recovery is faster than after PRK, but the procedure demands great precision to avoid overlapping incisions and epithelial complications.
Under-correction or regression remains possible whatever the technique. Any enhancement is included in the first year of follow-up.
The longest clinical track record; enhancement is simple.
No deep cut, for thin corneas.
When the cornea does not allow laser treatment.
SFO information leaflet (in French)
This leaflet is published by the Société Française d'Ophtalmologie (French Society of Ophthalmology). It describes the procedure, its results and its risks. It serves as the basis for informed consent and does not replace the consultation.
Frequently asked questions
LASIK cuts a flap that is then lifted; SMILE removes a lenticule through a micro-incision, with no flap. Corneal biomechanics are better preserved and dry eye is less marked, but enhancement is trickier.
Yes, since 2024, with the CE-marked SMILE pro module, up to seven dioptres. It is only available on the VisuMax 800 laser, which the platform where I operate has. LASIK still has a much longer clinical track record.
No. Anaesthetic eye drops, and the procedure itself is painless. The days that follow are usually only mildly uncomfortable, because the surface of the cornea is not removed.
With surface PRK, or with the CIRCLE technique, which turns the original cap into a LASIK flap so that the excimer laser can be applied.
It avoids flap-related complications, which is a real advantage. But LASIK has a twenty-five-year track record and a simpler enhancement. Neither is better in absolute terms.
The questionnaire gives you a first indication in three minutes. The pre-operative assessment measures what cannot be guessed: topography, corneal thickness, tear film and a dilated eye examination (fundus examination).
Dr Emmanuel Halimi
Ophthalmic surgeon · RPPS 10100555084 · Medical Council of Hauts-de-Seine no. 92/23003
Page written and approved by the surgeon.
Last medical review: